Site news

FILE FIR ON AEE BDA FOR USING SUPERSEDED FINAL NOTIFICATION FOR TRESS PASS

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
FILE FIR ON AEE BDA FOR USING SUPERSEDED FINAL NOTIFICATION FOR TRESS PASS
by System Administrator - Sunday, 21 December 2014, 4:28 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangaluru: Kengeri Police Inspector need to book FIR on complaint ofM.Mahesh s/o Late Mahadevaiahagainst sri Krishana Murthy AEE BDA Housing Sub-Division as he has violated latest final notification issued by Government under section 19 of BDA Act .Sri Kishna Murthy AEE Housing project in has no business in land acquisition matters and he defending IN THE COURT OF THE XVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE, BANGALORE O. S. No. 26334/2014 in respect of Survey Number 101/2B ValagerahalliKengeri Hobli Bangalore South Taluka is illegal when he is not land acquisition officer .Reportedly commissioner has not issued any orderauthorizinghim to defend the case and Additional Land Acquisition Officer was not allowed to file objections with the connivance of the contractor and there was no legal opinion obtained to re-start the work as case is pending in court and honorable court had given status quo order for both the parties by an order dated09-10-2014and vocated the status quo order for the both parties as vacating the status quo order give equal opportunity to both parties to re-start the work as status quo order given was to restrain both parties to maintain the status quo . Sri Kishna Murthy AEE Housing project did got the judicial blunder by getting the status quo order vacated for both the parties vacating the earlier status quo order given to both the parties which given was given to restrain both parties to maintain the status quo and now both are free to work on the land And it creates law and order problem for police and this order in any case is challenged in high court by plaintiff against BDA. It is better BDA wait final order in the case before tress passing the land. It is also to be seen that the BDA has plunged ahead with the project and erected started erecting building even during the pendency of this petition started the work - unconscious of its folly or may be even brash indifference as to the consequences if any to be borne by BDA. Reportedly it is expected that and It is not in doubt that the petitions, however, would succeed in the light of the several cases and infirmity committed. The acquisition proceedings in so far as the petitioners' lands in terms of the impugned gazette Final notifications are concerned; BDA earlier notifications stand quashed or superseded. Hope fully The BDA will be directed to put the petitioners in possession of lands which were never be the subject matter of acquisition”.