By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangaluru : Revenue Minister Srinivas Prasad has said that the State government has set March 2016 as the deadline for correcting discrepancies which have crept in the 1.61 crore records of Rights, Tenancy and Crops (RTC) in the State. Computerization of the RTCs had not solved the problem and mistakes may have crept in during data entry. "As per the information available with the State government, there are defects in more than 50 per cent of the records,” Mr. Prasad said. Instructions have been issued to set right these defects during Revenue Adalats held in the districts and to reach out to individual houses of farmers.The revenue department did Bhoomi project but still many anomalies are left in computerized RTC . The grant of the land is subject to the conditions detailed in the Saguvali Chit.The famers is asking in respect ofS No 150 / P8 Hulikunte Village DoddabelvangalaHobliDoddaballapurTaluka10 AcresAgricultural Land reasons from revenue department for not taking the upset price or penal upset price in respect of Grow more Food Programme leasses as per rules despite request of original grant holder had written several letter to collect upset price of Rs 200 per acres as per the government orders vide Sri chikkarudrayya Bin Rudrayyaletter dated 06-10-1958 to sub-divisional officerDoddaballapur Sub- Division Bangalore district .Otherwise Even now government need to collect it with penal upset price as conditions of the original lease grant have been fulfilled, the lease grants have to be confirmed to them.(Circular No. R6-53S2-92--L.R. 41-55-29, dated 7th July 1955 and Saguvali chit allotted to Sri ckkarudrayya Bin Rudrayyaas per Government Circular No. R6-53S2-92--L.R. 41-55-29, dated 7th July 1955). Even in the case of sufficient holders, where the conditions of the original lease grant have been fulfilled, the lease grants have to be confirmed to them.(Circular No. R6-53S2-92--L.R. 41-55-29, dated 7th July 1955). In deserving cases, where the leases have bees, cancelled due to non-fulfillment of the terms of the giaut, the same lands could be re-granted to the same lessees at a penal upset price. This direction would apply also to lessees, who are sufficient holders, subject to the condition that, when such re-grant is in excess of the powers of the officer cancelling the lease, a recommendation for such re-grant may be made.