Site news

MHRD DOUBLE STANDARDS: IITS CENTRAL UNIVERSITIES IIITS FACES FACULTY CRUNCH: LET UGC KEEP MINMUM ELGIBLITY TO 50% FOR ALL PhD

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
MHRD DOUBLE STANDARDS: IITS CENTRAL UNIVERSITIES IIITS FACES FACULTY CRUNCH: LET UGC KEEP MINMUM ELGIBLITY TO 50% FOR ALL PhD
by System Administrator - Monday, 21 August 2017, 5:14 AM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: UGC should KEEP the minimum standards to 50% of average at PG level for doing PhD and appointment of lecturers for all including general CATEGORY as presently this is applicable only to SC and ST candidates and this will ensure supply of teachers to all institutions .When you have 50% of average at PG level for doing PhD and appointment of lecturers for SC ST why not you extend this to general category .MHRD cannot play double standards in education .A bad student is best teacher .Financial crunch at IITS and IIITS for appoint of professors and lecturers .AICTE and MHRD follow double standards .They are very critical of private institutions and cancel their affiliations on shortages of faculty and they do not take any action on IITS as they are Government run institution LIKE IITS and IIITS. MHRD is failing to replace teachers who are retiring or resigning even in places like the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, IITs or some other top institutes. "The problem has to be viewed holistically and problem is artificially created by UGC standards on teachers of universities. UGC should reduce the minimum standards to 50% of average at PG level for doing PhD and appointment of lecturers .When you allow 50% for SC and ST and other backward categories why not general candidates .This double standards is killing the education and reducing the opportunities to many and this creates an artificial scarcity for teachers in the institutions ..It needs immediate attention. Having good faculty is crucial .Given the opportunities in other sectors and abroad for more talented , finding a good faculty of more who scored more than 55% is difficult. Let the UGC reduces it to 50% for all and many candidates will be in line for teaching jobs.It is said that a bad student is some time a good teacher,. AICTE and MHRD are not bothered about the state of affairs of IITS in India .According to data compiled by the Union HRD ministry in Sept 2014, only IIT-Gandhinagar has 99% of the sanctioned faculty. Here's some unpalatable truth for a nation dreaming to set up a string of new-age technology institutes: more than 37% of the faculty posts in the existing 16 Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) are vacant. The IITs have 4,308 faculty members against the sanctioned 6,944. IIT-Kharagpur, long considered an ace, reports a 46% shortage.The overall student-faculty ratio stands at 16:1.Going by the faculty matrix in the existing IITs, the MHRD need 100 faculty members per 1,000 students in the new institutes. Assuming each of the five new institutes gets about 200 students, and then the government has to hire at least 100 faculty members. Most centrally funded institutions, including the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), National Institutes of Technology (NITs) and universities, are conducting classes with large number of faculty positions vacant, prompting the government to launch a major recruitment drive.Worst hit are new central universities with 53.28% vacancies followed by NITs with 47% teacher vacancies.Old as well as new IITs, too, have over 35% vacancies, human resource development minister Prakash Javadekar said while announcing a major recruitment drive across campuses in the next fortnight.Reportedly in an interaction with journalists, Javadekar said the ministry was thinking of re-employment and wooing industry experts to fill up the teaching vacancies. Concerned over the number of vacancies in faculty positions, HRD minister said institutions will have to at least fill up 75% untenanted posts by the year-end. Information provided to Parliament by the ministry on August 3, 2017 does not indicate that the situation improved significantly. While vacancy status for old IITs has been recorded at 39%, new ones are only marginally better at 36%. NITs are worst affected with 47% vacancies.In fact 14 of 20 old NITs have a 40% and more vacancies, while four of eight old IITs have the same vacancy levels. Even Indian Institutes of Management (IIMs) have 26.01% vacancies. Among the IIMs, Indore has 51% vacant positions, followed by Kolkata with 41%. .Reportedly A big question mark has been posed by a parliamentary committee on the Modi government's rhetorical claims that it's determined to convert India into a hub of higher learning with a number of refurbished valuable institutes such as IIT, NIT and IIM.Taking stock of the current situation prevailing in the education sector for higher professional studies including several universities, the panel points out "acute shortage of faculty” in these educational institutions as it expresses anguish on finding that out that this problem has emerged as "the biggest handicap for the development and growth of higher education vis-a-vis maintaining the quality of education”.It is not the first time that the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Human Resource Development headed by Satyanarayan Jatiya has pointed loopholes in the system for higher education. But the committee has expressed regrets that despite serious concerns expressed earlier, "situation continues to be grim with no improvement foreseen in the near future”.In its deposition before the committee, the Human Resource Development (HRD) ministry had said that the total number of sanctioned teaching posts in various Central Universities was 16,600 (2376 Professors, 4708 Associate Professors and 9521 Assistant Professors).According to reports Out of these teaching posts, 5928 teaching posts were laying vacant (1277 Professors, 2173 Associate Professors, and 2478 Assistant Professors) for a considerable time.Stressing that the availability of adequate and qualified faculty is a pre-requisite for quality education, the committee tries to determine the cause of the grave crisis of faculty.