By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: There should be no-discrimination among anybody and everyone is forbidden from discriminating, irrespective of whether you are a minority or a majority community or group member. It is reported that despite no case exists in the name of Dr Priya Narayanan CUK VC is not ready to give vigilance clearance despite B report is filed in respect of a case faced by Dr Priya Narayanan but in similar vein he is not ready to ask a vigilance report from Gulbarga University .Glaring discrimination by VC CUK .A senior member of the executive council reportedly said, "The person who was appointed as registrar is facing allegation of corruption and a case is still under investigation at the Lokayukta. According to the University Grants Commission (UGC) norms, before appointing any person to posts like the registrar, the university concerned must take vigilance clearance report from the department or university concerned. But, while appointing Prof Yetanoor, CUK had not sought any such clearance. Even the vice-chancellor of CUK reportedly accepted the fact that he has not sought any such report. There should be no-discrimination among anybody and everyone is forbidden from discriminating, irrespective of whether you are a minority or a majority group member. So keep 10 portraits belonging to all as per section 7 of University Act in the central Hall of University. Central University of Karnataka Kadaganchi has anti-discrimination law under section 7 of Central University Act and as per section 7 of Central University Act The University is open to all caste, creed, race or class and cannot force one belief or one test on others. Which is blatantly violated by VC and he targets a Dr Priya Narayanan woman faculty member by filing a atrocity case by a proxy with a illegal discriminative circular allegedly approved by himself .But in CUK 'right to discriminate' is seen as a "private entitlement” of VC to harass faculty members wherein has allowed and authorized Dr Deene a Assistant Professor to issue Discriminative Circular on 21-04-2017 after the commemoration of 125th birth day of Dr Ambedkar was over on 14-04-2016 (There was no need to issue such circular at all after 14-04-2017 ) just to harass Dr Priya Narayanan (Nobody else was filed atrocity case) in violation of section 7 of Central University Act to keep a portrait allegedly belonging to one class of society in every room of university "forcibly” and based on such discriminative circular allowed a staff member to file atrocity case on professor belonging to other class of the society much against the Article 15 of constitution written by Dr Ambedkar himself. The Constitution of India states that there can be no discrimination in the name of religion, cast, creed or sex. Article 15(1), under Fundamental Rights, states: "The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, and place of birth or any of them.” Article 14 stresses that the State "shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India”. "Reportedly almost everyone in CUK has been a victim of some sort of discrimination, and almost everyone allegedly see VC as perpetrator.”The Request to issue of new circular with at least with 10 portraits proposed before UGC take action on CUK for violation of section 7 of Central University Act. It is pertinent to note that violation of section 7 of Central University Act attracts Several IPC Sections 153A, 295 and 295A of the IPC and it can be a police case against Registrar and VC and Dr Deene forpromotion of disharmony, enmity or feelings of hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities punishable Offence.I have received information by UGC that my letter is in process and decision will be communicated to me by UGC and MHRD in respect of action taken report in respect of violation of section 7 of Central University Act by Central University of Karnataka Kadaganchi.We cannot pick and choose the discrimination we want to end and those we wish to continue. We must all confront our own prejudices and assumptions. That is whymy suggestionseeks to protect not only SC ST and minorities and disadvantaged groups of all shades, but also minorities as well as majorities (with exceptions for affirmative action). Also, everyone is forbidden from discriminating, irrespective of whether you are a minority or a majority group member. So keep 10 portraits belonging to all as per section 7 of University Act in the central Hall of University.
It is suggested by few experts that CUK must withdraw the Dr Deene Circular which violates section 7 of Central University Act shall be withdrawn forth with as per section 7 of Central University Act University is open to all caste, creed, race or class and cannot force one belief or one test on others. Mr Kamble should be instructed to withdraw the protest petition filed against B Report in atrocity case on Dr Priya Narayanan and form a Committee on Installation of Portraits in Central University of Karnataka buildings like the one functioning in Parliament House Complex as Joint Committee on Installation of Portraits/Statues of National Leaders and Parliamentarians in Parliament House Complex and The Central University of Karnataka after announcing formation of Committee on Installation of Portraits in Central University of Karnataka buildings which will consider at least 10 Portraitsand decide places where Portraits will be kept as The demandmade from several quarters that Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi should take all sections of society along and issue a Fresh circular for portraits for inclusion of the incumbent President, Swami Vivekananda , Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, great Sufi saint Khwaja Bande Nawaz. , saint Basaweshwara , Dr , B.R. Ambedkar and incumbent Vice Chancellor and Pro Vice Chancellor and Chancellor in CUK .Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi cannot ill offer to display only one portrait of one National leader as proposed and implemented by Dr Deene of CUK leaving all others .Protocol of Portrait Display is very important andwill discuss and agree to the proposal made and add any other portraits if required and demanded by university faculty and thenrecommend issue of a comprehensive circular and Central University of Karnataka Committee on Installation of Portraits in Central University of Karnataka buildings will take as base guidance decisions taken Joint Committee on Installation of Portraits/Statues of National Leaders and Parliamentarians in Parliament House Complex and list of Portraits approved in Parliament House Complex and then this will end the wicked problem faced by Central University of Karnataka in respect of single portraits and forcible filing of Atrocity case on individuals.Choice is left to wisdom of Central University of Karnataka.