Site news

IN CUK ‘RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE’ IS SEEN AS A “PRIVATE ENTITLEMENT” OF “VC” TO HARASS FACULTY MEMBERS DESPITE CUK HAS “ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW”

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
IN CUK ‘RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE’ IS SEEN AS A “PRIVATE ENTITLEMENT” OF “VC” TO HARASS FACULTY MEMBERS DESPITE CUK HAS “ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW”
by System Administrator - Friday, 4 August 2017, 3:17 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Central University of Karnataka Kadaganchi has anti-discrimination law under section 7 of Central University Act and as per section 7 of Central University Act The University is open to all caste, creed, race or class and cannot force one belief or one test on others. Which is blatantly violated by VC and he targets a Dr Priya Narayanan woman faculty member by filing a atrocity case by a proxy with a illegal discriminative circular allegedly approved by himself .But in CUK 'right to discriminate' is seen as a "private entitlement” of VC to harass faculty members wherein has allowed and authorized Dr Deene a Assistant Professor to issue Discriminative Circular on 21-04-2017 after the commemoration of 125th birth day of Dr Ambedkar was over on 14-04-2016 (There was no need to issue such circular at all after 14-04-2017 ) just to harass Dr Priya Narayanan (Nobody else was filed atrocity case) in violation of section 7 of Central University Act to keep a portrait allegedly belonging to one class of society in every room of university "forcibly” and based on such discriminative circular allowed a staff member to file atrocity case on professor belonging to other class of the society much against the Article 15 of constitution written by Dr Ambedkar himself. The Constitution of India states that there can be no discrimination in the name of religion, cast, creed or sex. Article 15(1), under Fundamental Rights, states: "The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, and place of birth or any of them.” Article 14 stresses that the State "shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India”. "Reportedly almost everyone in CUK has been a victim of some sort of discrimination, and almost everyone allegedly see VC as perpetrator.”The Request to issue of new circular with at least with 10 portraits proposed before UGC take action on CUK for violation of section 7 of Central University Act. It is pertinent to note that violation of section 7 of Central University Act attracts Several IPC Sections 153A, 295 and 295A of the IPC and it can be a police case against Registrar and VC and Dr Deene forpromotion of disharmony, enmity or feelings of hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities punishable Offence. I have received information by UGC that my letter is in process and decision will be communicated to me by UGC and MHRD in respect of action taken report in respect of violation of section 7 of Central University Act by Central University of Karnataka Kadaganchi.We cannot pick and choose the discrimination we want to end and those we wish to continue. We must all confront our own prejudices and assumptions. That is whymy suggestionseeks to protect not only SC ST and minorities and disadvantaged groups of all shades, but also minorities as well as majorities (with exceptions for affirmative action). Also, everyone is forbidden from discriminating, irrespective of whether you are a minority or a majority group member. So keep 10 portraits belonging to all as per section 7 of University Act in the central Hall of University.

It is suggested by few experts that CUK must withdraw the Dr Deene Circular which violates section 7 of Central University Act shall be withdrawn forth with as per section 7 of Central University Act University is open to all caste, creed, race or class and cannot force one belief or one test on others. Mr Kamble should be instructed to withdraw the protest petition filed against B Report in atrocity case on Dr Priya Narayanan and form a Committee on Installation of Portraits in Central University of Karnataka buildings like the one functioning in Parliament House Complex as Joint Committee on Installation of Portraits/Statues of National Leaders and Parliamentarians in Parliament House Complex and The Central University of Karnataka after announcing formation of Committee on Installation of Portraits in Central University of Karnataka buildings which will consider at least 10 Portraitsand decide places where Portraits will be kept as The demandmade from several quarters that Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi should take all sections of society along and issue a Fresh circular for portraits for inclusion of the incumbent President, Swami Vivekananda , Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, great Sufi saint Khwaja Bande Nawaz. , saint Basaweshwara , Dr , B.R. Ambedkar and incumbent Vice Chancellor and Pro Vice Chancellor and Chancellor in CUK .Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi cannot ill offer to display only one portrait of one National leader as proposed and implemented by Dr Deene of CUK leaving all others .Protocol of Portrait Display is very important and will discuss and agree to the proposal made and add any other portraits if required and demanded by university faculty and thenrecommend issue of a comprehensive circular and Central University of Karnataka Committee on Installation of Portraits in Central University of Karnataka buildings will take as base guidance decisions taken Joint Committee on Installation of Portraits/Statues of National Leaders and Parliamentarians in Parliament House Complex and list of Portraits approved in Parliament House Complex and then this will end the wicked problem faced by Central University of Karnataka in respect of single portraits and forcible filing of Atrocity case on individuals.Choice is left to wisdom of Central University of Karnataka.

The MHRD Deputy Secretary central universities has failed to institute inquiry agonist VC Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi as per the letter of UGC F No 35-35/2012(CU) Dated 20-04-2017 for violation of section 7 of CUK Act. A woman faculty member is humiliated and harassed in violation of section 7 of CUK Act. Why a woman faculty member should face illegal fake atrocity case which is reportedly Master minded initiated scripted authored written directed by VC CUK by permitting to issue a illegal circular in violation of section 7 of CUK Act by using few SC ST persons from outside and inside of CUK campus to hide his reported financial and academic irregularities and simply to harass woman faculty member despite the woman faculty member agreed to abide by the circular if it is issued by Registrar as per section 7 of CUK Act. NAAC must reject the application of Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi for accreditation as it has violated several key aspects o accreditation even on Infrastructure and Learning Resources and exhibition of poor governance .The required number of faculties are not appointed and exhibition of poor governance governanace .NAAC has identified the seven criteria to serve as the basis of its assessment procedures one among them is Governance, Leadership and Management and despiteCentral University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi has violated section 7 of Central University Actaccording to which the CUK must be is open to all caste, creed, race or class but NAAC has not taken note of An illegal circular was issued by Dr Deene on illegal authorization of VC which is about only one portrait of one national leader as proposed and leaving all others as University has to take along all sections of society creed and religion and cannot ill offered to display only one portrait of one leader as proposed leaving all others so this Circular violates section 7 of Central University Act as University is open to all caste, creed, race or class and cannot force one belief on others. And despite clear directions in section 7 of Central University Actthe VC and Registrar themselves are forcing a faculty members to accept an illegal circular and filing atrocity case based on illegal circular on woman employee of CUK in violation of section 7 of Central University Act and despite demands were made to re-issue the circular in compliance of section 7 of Central University Actcovering all all caste, creed, race or class issue a comprehensive circular encompassing ten portraits and solve the problem of favoring one cl;ass and disfavoring others classes and violating section 7 of CUK Act . The demand is made from several quarters that Central University of Karnataka (CUK) AT Kalburgi should take all sections of society along and issue a Fresh circular for portraits for inclusion of the incumbent President, Swami Vivekananda , Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, great Sufi saint Khwaja Bande Nawaz. , saint Basaweshwara , Dr , B.R. Ambedkar and incumbent Vice Chancellor and Pro Vice Chancellor and Chancellor in CUK .