Site news

INNOCENTS CHARGE SHEETED: NO ACTION BY WHITE FIELD POLICE STATION IN FIR 22/2014

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
INNOCENTS CHARGE SHEETED: NO ACTION BY WHITE FIELD POLICE STATION IN FIR 22/2014
by System Administrator - Friday, 12 December 2014, 2:20 AM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangaluru : I have filed an RTI Appeal Under RTI Act before police appellate authority. The PIO has not provided me correct information in respect of FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 and FIR Number 121/2012 dated 22-04-2012 and charge sheets filed .He has provided incorrect false and misleading information. The complainant Smt Pankaja address in her complaint is "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”The complainant Smt Pankajaaddress written in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 is . "No 38 1 Cross 1ST MAIN Prashanta Layout White Field Bangalore: 560066”.But Police FIR states that complainant Smt Pankajaaddress is "No 38 1 Cross 1ST MAIN Prashanta Layout White Field Bangalore: 560066 "which is incorrect false and misleading information as her address in The complainant address in her complaint is "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618 .When the accused were not staying at No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 with complainant at the complainant address in her complaint then question of torturing the complainant under section 498A does not arise as both were staying separately at two different addresses . Charge sheet filed is false in case FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 by white fields police and they need to file B-Report .The charge sheet filed in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 that complainant Smt Pankajaaddress is "No 38 1 Cross 1ST MAIN Prashanta Layout White Field Bangalore: 560066 "which is incorrect false and misleading information as her address in The complainant address in her complaint is "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618" and it is pertinent to note that same white filed police have filedcharge sheet inFIR Number 121/2012 dated 22-04-2012 the address ofSmt Pankaja is shown as"No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”.In FIR 22/2014 DATED 23-01-2014 Smt Pankajaaddress is "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”. And in Smt Pankaja has mentined hedr address in hedr bail order also "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”. Senior citizens life is in danger and anything can happen to their life and police alone will be held are responsible if anything happened to them by criminal activity of Mrs Pankaja Singh and her alleged UP Links with criminal gangs.

As there is no law and order in police station itself, as police have charge sheeted innocent senior citizens leaving criminal scot-free. FIR has legal sanctity .It is pertinent to note that FIR and FIR address cannot be changed as per investigating officers will and wish and convenience and fantasies and getting fresh statements according to investigating officers convenience.Sub inspector and investigating and filing charge sheet on senior citizens is a fraud and leaving Mrs Pankaja Singh without charge sheet in fake certificates FIR speaks of hisconnivance with criminal activity of Mrs Pankaja Singh .In view of this when she herself is fraud and criminal background and fake BA certificates she hadfiled a false compliant on in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 as her complaint address and FIR address both were different and sub-inspector got fresh statement from her to hide or cover-up his guilt in the case andinvestigating officercannot change FIR Address on her request after wardsand same address even appears in her diverse objection statement and investigating officer did this deliberately to facilitate her tress pass into senior citizens house and as her pleas was false.

Filing of complaint by Smt Pankaja Singh and FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 is an afterthought and false as a month ago before filing the FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 Abhijit left her company and filed Divorce petition on 01-02-2012 .Her complaint dated on 19-02-2012 .Wherefore Abhijit giving her any mental tortureor physical torture does not arise. Asabhijit mother and Father and his grandparents in thefamily does not stayed with Mrs Pankaja Singh question of our giving her any torture accused in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012.does not arise .Her compliant is false and the charge sheet filed by investigating officer is also false incorrect and misleading and deliberately the investigating officer suppress these facts .Despite the fact that D.V.Ramu provided all proofs and evidences to prove his innocence .It is clear proof that the investigating officer colluded with criminalCrime Number 121/2012 dated 22-04-2012 and file false chage sheet .On facts the investigating officer could have filed B report inFIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 and charge sheeted Mrs Pankaja Singhfor 420 448 and for offences committed in fake certificates rackets of UP university as alleged with criminal gangs of UP University fake certificates gangs. No investigation done and No charge sheet is filed by White Field Police Station on FIR 22/2014 DATED 23-01-2014 Despite The office the controller of examination university of Lucknow has reported that "As per University record Roll No 1200304 is not allotted in the year 2005 and it does not exists and it gives indication that Smt Pankajahas created or got fake certificates from criminal gangs of UP (Latest copy received from University was submitted to police station ) which she claims in her final year BA exam in 2005

Conclusions : As per above records : Smt Pankajaaddress "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618and she does not stay ather Father in law house at"No 38 1 Cross 1ST MAIN Prashanta Layout White Field Bangalore: 560066 wherefore the charge sheet filed inFIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 is false incorrect and misleading and leading to miscarriage of justice to accused inFIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 and police need to revise charge sheet and file B Report in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012."No judgment of a Court, no order of Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud: In Lazarus Estates Ltd. v. Beasley, (1956)2 QB 702 at PP. 712-13 Lord Denning, LJ. Said "No judgment of a Court, no order of Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud. Fraud unravels everything."Court in express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors. has held thus:"Fraud on power; voids the order if it is not exercised bonafide for the end design. There is a distinction between exercise of power in good faith and misuse in bad faith. The former arises when an authority misuses its power in breach of law, say, by taking into account bonafide, and with best of intentions, some extraneous matters or by ignoring relevant matters. That would render the impugned act or order ultra vires. It would be a case of fraud on powers. The misuse in bad faith arises when the power is exercised for an improper motive, say, to satisfy a private or personal grudge or for wreaking vengeance of a Minister as in S. Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab,A Power is exercised malaciously if its repository is motivated by personal animosity towards those who are directly affected by its exercise. Use of a power for an 'alien' purpose other than the one for which the power is conferred is mala fide use of that power. Same is the position when an order is made for a purpose other than that which finds place in the order. The ulterior or alien purpose clearly speaks of the misuse of the power and it was observed as early as in 1904 by Lord Lindley in General Assembly of Free Church of Scotland v. Overtown, 1904 AC 515, that there is a condition implied in this as well as in other instruments which create powers, namely, that the power shall be used bona fide for the purpose for which they are conferred'.