Site news

VC IS NOT CAPABLE TO TAKE ACTION ON DR SHIVAKUMAR DEENE AND KAMBLE FOR “FALSE FABRICATED UN-CIRCULATED AND STALE CIRCULAR”

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
VC IS NOT CAPABLE TO TAKE ACTION ON DR SHIVAKUMAR DEENE AND KAMBLE FOR “FALSE FABRICATED UN-CIRCULATED AND STALE CIRCULAR”
by System Administrator - Sunday, 29 January 2017, 8:36 AM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru : I have asked CUK PIO provide me information and reasons under section 4(I) RTI Act for not taking disciplinary action on Dr Deene and Mr Kamble for filing false atrocity case on Dr Priya of CUK based on an un-circulated and stale circular and still Mr Kamble is protesting B report filed by Police as according to information given by PIO and registrar CUK to my RTI application Central University of Karnataka Dr Shivakumar Deene SC ST Cell CUK issued a circular dated 21st April 2016 and he also confirms that this circular was never circulated to anybody in CUK as it was illegal to circulate after 14-04-2016 The 125th birth anniversary of Dr B R Ambedkar's was celebrated and it does not have any document to show that it was circulated then how come this circular reached in the hands of Mr Kamble in the month of May 2016 who filed a false atrocity case on Dr Priya based on this fabricated and un-circulated circular . Circular which is not circulated is not binding on anybody in the CUK.It is also 8th wonder of the world without circulating the circular portraits reached every room of the CUK. The 125th birth anniversary of Dr B R Ambedkar's was celebrated on 14-04-2016 and approving and issuing this circular by VC and Dr Shivakumar Deene SC ST Cell CUK on 21-04-2016 is illegal and violation of UGC Circulars issued on this subject. This circular can be oaky on the occasion on 14-04-2016 and cannot be a permanent circular of CUK this can be only valid only on 14-04-2016 on which date The 125th birth anniversary of Dr B R Ambedkar's was celebrated if at all it was issued on 14-04-2106 .This information and reasons need to be provided to me as per Guide on RTIto Information Act 2005 published by the Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Department of Personnel & Training (available here :http://rti.gov.in/RTICorner/Guideonrti.pdf) on page 12 and Para 9, following is stated: Providing Reasons for Decisions: The public authorities take various administrative and quasi-judicial decisions which affect the interests of certain persons. It is mandatory for the concerned public authority to provide reasons for such decisions to the affected persons. It may be done by using appropriate mode of communication .Attention is also invited towards the thread 'affected person ' under rti act.In fact, it can be said that "Affected" refers back to an action. The"Affected Persons" are the ones who are affected by that action. The reasons need to be given to affected person and copy of that can be given to me under 2 f of RTI Act. The CUKoffice is THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY under obligation to provide information "PUBLICLY” under section 4(1) (a) (b) (c) (d).

VC and Registrar CUKhave failed to constitute SC ST Cell as per UGC circular despite I made demand several time .SC ST Students educational development is very important than Dr Shivakumar Deenepolitics .Nobody is helping the SC ST students to get legitimate educational facilities from state government and central government and are busy in only creating lawlessness in campus in the name of a non issue .Let he VC issue an order after getting approval in Executive Councilthat in every room Dr. B.R. Ambedkar portrait shall be put and with other leaders portrait then every member of university will obey it and put the portraits and then it will be lawful .why an illegal circular which is not approved by VC is forced upon the faculty members just to keep someone happy at the cost of lawlessness .VC and Registrar CUK should act according to central University Act and ordinances governing academic and administrative matters (As approved by the Department of Higher Education Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India Vide letter F.No.57-5/2011-Desk(U), dated 28/03/2012) . According to document available to this reporter The VC had issued instruction for printing Souvenir ofDr. B.R. Ambedkar to be distributed to all but instead of that Dr Shivakumar Deene fabricated portrait circular without authority of law and purchased about 250 portrait by spending several lakhs rupees and such action and circular is illegal VC and Registrar and executive council need to act on him and dismiss him from service for committing such a big blunder of fabricating a university circular.. Dr Shivakumar Deeneactions amounts to subordinations and VC should act mercilessly on lawlessness of a faculty member. He could have bought one dignified big portrait to be kept in the central hall of the CUK as DR B.R. Ambedkar portrait is kept in the central hall of Parliament.CUK VC and registrarneed totake immediate action on fabricated and illegal circular issued by Dr Shivakumar Deene On 21-11-2016 claiming falsely that VC has approved it and forcibly asking everybody to put Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Portrait inevery room ofcentral university of Karnataka is outrageous and illogical and those who are opposing his circular he hadfiledatrocity cases through his goonsis still outrageous as illegal and without authority of Law and still the person who filed illegal case is continuing the same in the criminal court despite police have filed B report (When UGC circulars were meant for conducting seminars on 14-04-2016 and conducting constitution day on 26-11-2015 and CUK and UGC has not issued such instruction )and Mr Kamble (for his fabricated and falsepolice complaint) .TheRegistrar CUK in his order under RTI Appeal case number 01 Dated 21 July 2016 in point 6 has agreed that CUK has not issued such instruction regarding displaying the portraits of leaders at University or Universities every room and specifically, who are the persons whose portraits could be displayed? CUK as public authority does not have even one such circular and even UGC has replied under RTI on 11-07-2016 that it has not issues such guide line as claimed by Dr Shivakumar Deene and Mr Kamble (in his police complaint without permission of University). I have received clarification from the UGC .UGC has replied to my RTI Question and provided the information..It confirms that UGC did not issue any guidelines in respect of any portraits to be put in Universities. Dr Shivakauar Deenebrought 250 Dr Ambedkar portrait instead ofgetting printed Dr Ambedkar souvenir and distributing itas per VC Approval. I have asked CUK to provide me information under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act What action is proposed against Dr Shivakauar Deenewho brought 250 Dr Ambedkar portrait instead ofgetting printedDr Ambedkar souvenir and distributing itas per VC Approval dated 19th April (CUK/SC-ST /F-1) and issuing a circular though he is not the registrar of University todisplay the250 Dr Ambedkar portrait instead of distributingDr Ambedkar souvenir to all in central University of Karnataka. Whose portrait should be put up in the CUK buildings as per CUK EC resolutions? I want to know any CUK and MHRD and UGC rules or circulars regarding displaying the portraits of leaders at University or Universities every room and specifically, who are the persons whose portraits could be displayed? .This information was not provided to me within 48 hours as question of life and liberty of Dr Priya your Assistant professor was in question as one of your Group Demployee has filed complaint and FIR is booked with a fake circular issued by Dr Shivakumar Dene as he is not the registrar of the CUK.I have filed CIC Appeal in Central information commission for this lapse.