Site news

THE “CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF KARNATAKA” KALABURAGI NEEDS TO PUBLISH EVERY THING THEY DO IN A YEAR UNDER RTI ACT

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
THE “CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF KARNATAKA” KALABURAGI NEEDS TO PUBLISH EVERY THING THEY DO IN A YEAR UNDER RTI ACT
by System Administrator - Wednesday, 27 July 2016, 11:52 PM
 

By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: Central University of Karnataka Kadaganchi, Aland Road, Kalaburagi has to publish every year the work they carry out or the information they create under 4(1) (a) (b) (c) every day ,but it did not published all the work carried out by the CUK under section 4(1) (a) (b) (c) (d)of RTI Act 2005 and it has not provided citizens and opportunity to ask the reasons under section 4(1) (d). CUK registrar passing orders in first appeal without hearing or sending hearing notice is illegal and will render the order invalid. I have filed my first appeal on 08-06-2016 which need to be heard as per RTI Act -2005. CUK registrar need to provide me opportunity to present my pleadings with documents before him and then he can make a speaking order on my appeal and he also can provide opportunity to PIO also to provide his objections to my pleading and then he can deliver his order as per law and as per RTI Act. In CIC/SA/A/2014/000254 The Commission observes: Passing orders in first appeal without hearing or sending hearing notice is illegal and will render the order invalid. The Commission sets aside the orderof First Appellate Authority for violating RTI Act and breach of natural justice by denying theappellant a chance of presenting his case and by raising entirely a new defence which wasnever claimed. Commission finds it deserves action though the concerned officer retired fromservice and recommends Public Authority to initiate disciplinary action against the concernedFAO for acting totally against the RTI Act in this case. I have already filed CIC appeal and copies have been sent to you and PIO.I had asked CUK PIO whose portrait should be put up in the CUK buildings? I wanted to know any CUK and MHRD and UGC rules or circulars regarding displaying the portraits of leaders at University or Universities every room and specifically, who are the persons whose portraits could be displayed? But instead of giving the circulars asked PIO have given me copies of Dr Ambedkar Jayanthi whereas UGC has replied to me that it did not issue any guide lines in respect of portraits and I had asked to censure Dr Deene who has taken over registrars powers to issue Circular illegally and also declare his circular as illegal .I have asked FAA to issue orders to PIO to provide me information asked and announce penalty on PIO every day of delay in providing me correct answer from the date of my application.

Background - Currently, the Central University Gulbarga UGC MRD have no circulars on displaying the portraits of leaders at University or Universities every room and specifically, who are the persons whose portraits could be displayed. As per RTI Act so-motto declaration by CUK1) Central University Act, 2009.Page.No(1-73) 2) CUK Ordinance governing academic & administrative matter CUK Act & Statutes CUKOrdinance there is nothing available in respect of Whose portrait should be put up in the CUK buildings. Under section7(4) of the central university Act it shall be duty of registrar to conduct official correspondence of the court the executive council and academic council . VC did notgot approval of EC as per Central University Act 2009 Section 11 (1) (2) (3)ECbefore or after approving Dr Shivakauar Deene to issue circularas it is claimed by VC CUKthat he had approved as Dr Shivakauar Deene issuedcircular or what is claimed as "circular” of the University to forcibly asking everybody to put 250 Dr. B.R. Ambedkar portraits inevery room ofcentral university of Karnataka threatening theVC and registrar that he will book atrocity case on them if they oppose him and his circular. VC Failed to get it ratified in EC meetingheld on 17-06-2016 held at Bengaluru wherefore Dr Shivakumar Deenecircular with approval of VC stands as withdrawnrevoked and rescinded. Dr Priya CUK Assistant professor is reportedly planning to file criminal defamation case against Dr Shivakumar Deeneand Mr Kambale for 10 crore jointly for falsely implicating Dr Priyain atrocity case and creating chaos and dhrnas in university by bringing external rowdy elements and damaging her reputation and modesty of woman based on fake circular fabricated and created Dr Shivakumar Deene without authority of law and Mr Kambale by threatening theVC and registrar that he will book atrocity case on them if they oppose him and his circular.

Central University of Karnataka Kadaganchi, Aland Road, Kalaburagi has to publish every year the work they carry out or the information they create under 4(1) (a) (b) (c) every day ,but it did not published all the work carried out by the CUK under section 4(1) (a) (b) (c) (d)of RTI Act 2005 and it has not provided citizens and opportunity to ask the reasons under section 4(1) (d). This information and reasons need to be provided to everybody as per Guide on RTIto Information Act 2005 published by the Government of India Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Department of Personnel & Training (available here :http://rti.gov.in/RTICorner/Guideonrti.pdf) on page 12 and Para 9, following is stated: Providing Reasons for Decisions: The public authorities take various administrative and quasi-judicial decisions which affect the interests of certain persons. It is mandatory for the concerned public authority to provide reasons for such decisions to the affected persons. It may be done by using appropriate mode of communication .Attention is also invited towards the thread 'affected person ' under rti act.In fact, it can be said that "Affected" refers back to an action. The"Affected Persons" are the ones who are affected by that action. The reasons need to be given to affected person and copy of that can be given to me under 2 f of RTI Act. The KSOUoffice is THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY under obligation to provide information "PUBLICLY” under section 4(1) (a) (b) (c) (d). The state government and all its departments need to publish everything they do in year as per RTI Act 2005 and this need to be published every year and applicant asking information becomes easier to provide also to the applicant and Government becomes transparent .

Citizens can force every PA to create information every day strictly as per the system and procedure as per listed Acts and rules regulations listed under 4(1) (a) (b) (c) every day and that can be cross cheeked by applicant by asking reasons under 4(1) (d) by the affected person and copy of the same can be given to any applicant under 2( f)of RTI Act .Promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority. Policy on Prevention, Detection, and Remediation of Fraud and Corruption by government is must and a major element of good governance is the control of corruption. For that reason, controlling corruption has been a key indicator. Good governance is a keystone of government. UPA government has given you RTI Act: Use It optimally :All opposition parties should use RTI optimally .Let they create booth wise RTI activists among their members or cadets and give them training and set of questions and gather that booth level information to perform better as opposition parties .Prime Minister should listen to opposition parties as they are voice of 66% voters. All responsible citizens should send RTI Question to each MP and each Minister and Prime Minister and get to know every day what they are doing and what they are performing and keep check on their performances and give them clear indication that India is awakened and want responsible Government which listens citizens.. All MLAs and 543 MPs are public servants : After election are over all MLAs are public servants and they are MLA for all the constituency .All MLAs should chalk out their plans for development of their constituencies irrespective of who voted for them or who is not voted for them .