Site news

“BDA” TPM APPROVED “LAYOUT PLAN” FOR HAL II STAGE AND REVENUE SURVEY MAP DOOKANHALLI DO NOT MATCH EACH OTHER

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
“BDA” TPM APPROVED “LAYOUT PLAN” FOR HAL II STAGE AND REVENUE SURVEY MAP DOOKANHALLI DO NOT MATCH EACH OTHER
by System Administrator - Monday, 11 July 2016, 3:48 AM
 

By : M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangalore :The HAL 2ndStage BDA approved layout plan is fabricated one as it is made to facilitate the approving of The Amalgamation of Site No 1198 and 1199in S.No42Dookanhalli Villlage as the revenue survey numbers with reference to north provided does not match with actual survey numbers printed in revenue map provide by Government of Karnataka. The S.No42Dookanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) HAL 2ndschedule as per revenue map and layout plan schedule does not mach each other. In place of 44 survey number 46 survey number is printed in BDA Approved layout plan with reference to north and this do not match with revenue map printed by Government of Karnataka The BDA is THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY under obligation to provide information "PUBLICLY” under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act.

I have asked PIO TPM to provide me information and action taken report on my letter dated 12-05-2016 to cancel the amalgamation in respect of The Amalgamation of layout plan is prepared without reference to S.No42Dookanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) HAL 2ndStage Bangalore in respect of Site No 1198 and 1199.I have asked PIO TPM to provide me certified copy of proof of revenue survey plan and report to locate S.No42Dookanhalli ofSite No 1198 and 1199on ground if provided by the applicant and If he has not provided the you provide me reasons for not cancelling the amalgamation as the applicant has not provide proof of location of his sites Site No 1198 and 1199in S.No42Dookanhalli as application was made without disclosing the Fact that in S.No42Dookanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) HAL 2ndStage Bangalorethe site Numbers1198 and 1199were allotted as per Re-Conveyance Documents and sale deeds .The allotment documents in respect of site Numbers1198 and 1199 are very specific to S.No42Dookanhalli Villlage.

BDA should to stop exhibiting the style of functioning in a dictatorial manner either without understanding the statutory provisions, law laid down in a catena of decisions, violating rule of law or in utter ignorance of law. BDA cannot exercised powers illegally, arbitrarily and discriminately giving a go-bye to all norms, guidelines and principles required to be scrupulously followed for RTI Appeal as per RTI Act.. It is held by CIC in a case in File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000254"Passing orders in first appeal without hearing or sending hearing notice is illegal and will render the order invalid. The Commission sets aside the order of First Appellate Authority for violating RTI Act and breach of natural justice by denying the appellant a chance of presenting his case and by raising entirely a new defense which was never claimed. Commission finds it deserves action though the concerned officer retired from service and recommends Public Authority to initiate disciplinary action against the concerned FAO for acting totally against the RTI Act in this case."

The BDA TPM need to hear the appeal as per law . In an open court as per law and as per RTI Act in the interest of justice and equity . Without hearing he simply cannot issue a letter and close the matter.. I will prove that PIO has provided me incorrect false and misleading information and from the date of his incorrect reply in need to punish him every day of in-correct reply Rs200/-until he provide me correct information.Reportedly TPM has two layout plans one BDA approved Layout Plan of HAL II Stage Bangalore and another HAL II stage Appareddy Palya and Dookanhalli village layout plan .I had asked PIO to provide me certified copies of BDA approved Layout Plan of HAL II Stage Bangalore 10 sets Marking duly certified and clearly marking and certifyingSurvey .No 50 of Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL II Stage Bangalore and Site No 1198 and 1199(in S.No42Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) HAL 2ndStage Bangalore as both are on either side of 100 feet road Indiranagar as per BDA approved Layout Plan of HAL II Stage Bangalore. He has to provide me 10 sets Layout Plan 10 sets Marking duly certified and clearly marking and certifyingSurvey .No 50 of Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL II Stage Bangalore and Site No 1198 and 1199(in S.No42Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) HAL 2ndStage Bangalore free of cost as he has failed to provide me the copies in time as per my RTI Application .Instead PIO has provided me information about HAL II stage Appareddy Palya and Dookanhalli village layout plan in which it is said that Site No 1198 and 1199 are featured. I have stated in my appeal thatHAL II stageLayout Plandifferent andHAL II stage Appareddy Palya and Dookanhalli village layout plan is differentand both are not the same .If TPM officers have included Site No 1198 and 1199 (in S.No42Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) HAL 2ndStage Bangaloreat the place ofSurvey .No 50 of Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL II Stage Bangalore is blatant forgery and may face criminal cases for forging and fabrication Layout plans .It is pertinent tonote that No 50 of Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL II Stage Bangalore comes under Reconvey area as per under in Subject No. 378 by the Bangalore Development Authority's meeting dated 17-11-1982 as per Section 5 of the Amendment Act introduced Section 38-C in the Act and Section 9 of the Amendment Act validated the allotments made between 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986 retrospectively and Sri Miunswamy application is pending for re-convey sale deed before AC R&R BDA .This appeal need detailed hearing by TPMas I am submitting all the documents to prove that Appareddy Palya and Dookanhalli village layout plan is forged to help land grabbers and it is alleged that it ascam of several croresand crated to help few big builders and land grabbers and TPMto make a clear order..It is pertinent to note that two layout plan cannot have Site No 1198 and 1199 (in S.No42Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli ) at two different places. I am Waiting for TPM letter duly informing me and respondent PIO date for hearing , for this RTI Appeal under RTI Act 2005 in the interest of justice and equity...

BDA commissioner need to look into the matters pertaining to Re-Convey Section of BDA. No bribe no work?. For several years legitimate files are pending in re-convey section of BDA. It seems nothing happens without paying bribe in Re-convey section . BDA should to stop exhibiting the style of functioning in a dictatorial manner either without understanding the statutory provisions, law laid down in a catena of decisions, violating rule of law or in utter ignorance of law.BDA need to execute sale deed to Sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiahas per resolution number 378 dated 17-11-1982 . Cancel sale deed executed by BDA in respect of site no 1198 and 1199 HAL II stage as site allotted were illegal Sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiahhas Submitted the true copies of Documents 0n 10-08-2015 (signed by Gazetted officer or Notarised )as per Assistant commissioner(R&R)letter AC/R&R/50/15-16 Dated 27-07-2015 in respect of Re-Conveyance and execution of absolute Sale deed in Survey Number 50 Dookanhalli Indra Nagar Post, HAL 2ND StageBangalore: 560038 (Facing 100 feet Road) as per resolution in Subject No. 378 by the Bangalore Development Authority's meeting dated 17-11-1982 as per Section 5 of the Amendment Act introduced Section 38-C in the Act and Section 9 of the Amendment Act validated the allotments made between 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986 retrospectively. Presently sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiahis in possession of three sites 60X90 feet (two sites) and another one site 50x80 which need to be re-conveyed forthwith out of 3 acres 16 guntas as balance is encroached and for which court cases to be launched in Survey Number No 50 Dookanhalli Indra Nagar Post, HAL 2ND Stage Bangalore: 560038 (Facing 100 feet Road) which BDA need to re-convey in thename of Sri Muniswamy s/o Late Abbaiahlegal heirs after death of his father which is in S No 50 Dookanhalli Indra Nagar Post, HAL 2ND StageBangalore: 560038 (Facing 100 feet Road) which are owned by sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiahand as per and under section 38 C of BDA Act 1976 as amended up to date which comes under Re-Convey area as per BDA resolutionSubject No. 378 by the Bangalore Development Authority's meeting dated 17-11-1982 as per Section 5 of the Amendment Act introduced Section 38-C in the Act and Section 9 of the Amendment Act validated the allotments made between 20.12.1973 to 8.5.1986 retrospectively. Sri Muniswamy s/o Abbaiahown total 3 acres 16 guntas in Survey Number No 50 Dookanhalli Indra Nagar Post, HAL 2ND Stage Bangalore: 560038 (Facing 100 feet Road) .But many persons have encroached in his land without any authority of law and documents against whom he is launching and launched court cases against them for eviction and then for that land he hasreserved hisright to approach BDA for re-conveyance in due course as per law .

Request is made to pay the compensation double the Today's market rate as per New LA Act as no compensation is paid after acquiring the land . BDA acquired S.No 50 of Dukanhalli Villlage but not made award and not paid any compensation in the name of Abbaiah and no notice issued under section 9 and 10 of L A Act Abbaiah and no compensation for land acquired under the 1894 act has been paid to the land owner Abbaiah or deposited with a competent court and retained in the treasury possession was not taken under the notification under Section 16(2) of LA Act. Out of 13 Acres 26 Guntas in S.No 50 of Dukanhalli Villlage Kasba Hobli HAL 2ndStage Bangalore my father Abbaiah was owning 3 Acres 16 Guntasas per revenue records and by DC Bangalore only Vide OM B.DIST.LND(K) SR -358/78-79 on Dated 20-09-1979 and I am the legal heir to the property . In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court has held that if compensation for land acquired under the 1894 act has not been paid to the land owner or deposited with a competent court and retained in the treasury, then the acquisition would be deemed to have lapsed and would be covered under the 2013 law Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 ('2013 Act')entitling the landowners to higher compensation.