By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bengaluru: I have asked information and action taken report on KSHRC order in 248-10-14/2016 Dated 15-04-2016 from Mandya Police. Request is made to take necessary action against the police officers for human right violations of senior citizens. In the guise of 498A false allegation they cannot violate The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Act No. 56 of 2007) .The False compliant and false FIR No 223/2015 dated 07-10-2015 is registered at Mandya West Police Station despite that fact that asper compromise agreement dated 29-09-2014 arrived at Mandyapolice station itself Smt Akshata BC complainant was notstaying with in-laws house ofShivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 years senior citizens and Smt Dhanalaxmi w/o Sri P Chandan aged about 33 residing at No 62 1st main Kukkarnhalli Mysoru. Filing false compliant and false FIR in connivance with Mandya police stations officers' advice and with their concurrence is human right violations and police cooked up false story to harass innocents' senior citizens.Before registering FIR in matrimonial cases preliminary enquiry need to done and without preliminary enquiry it amounts to violation of Supreme Court order in WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 68 OF 2008 dated 12-11-2013 . Mandya Police Station Westneed to file B Report in case of Shivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 years senior citizens andSmt Dhanalaxmi w/o Sri P Chandan aged about 33 residing at No 62 1st main Kukkarnhalli Mysoru as they are not connected to this case.It is known that senior citizens have not committed any crime .It was love marriage which was arranged.It is Smt Askhatahacriminal tress pass in in-laws house and illegal activities of Smt Askhatahaandwas proved that she is guilty of criminal trespass and fraud committed by suppressing the compromise agreement dated 29-09-2014 arrived at Mandya police station according to which she should not come to senior citizens house.It is gross human right violations committed by police. It is a matter of common experience that most of these complaints under section 498-A IPC are filed in the heat of the moment over trivial issues without proper deliberations. We come across a large number of such complaints which are not even bona fide and are filed with oblique motive of forcing husband to leave the old age parents and make a separate house .
Reportedly and allegedlyher Motive seems to is to take out her husband out of in-laws house and away from senior citizens and have separate house and this complaint is filed with this malafied intention and it is said in FIR itself that police helped complainant forcibly and illegally to enter the house of senior citizensand then cook up a false compliant and file FIR .It is alleged that complaint was typed at police station and then FIR was booked with full connivance ofMandya police stations officers advice and with their concurrence but they have stated that complainant brought typed complaint and police did another blunder of suggesting complainant of filing MLC case in hospital and not taking the complaint statement at hospital and how it can be a MLC case when she was not admitted in the hospital and police did not take statement at hospital and instead they typed it at police station in comfortand guidance ofbest possible cooking up of cinematic crime story .
It is a matter of common knowledge that unfortunately matrimonial litigation is rapidly increasing in our country. All the courts in our country including SC are flooded with matrimonial cases. This clearly demonstrates discontent and unrest in the family life of a large number of people of the society .Based on the study of complaints of 498, 498a IPC and Dowry prohibition act, some of the cases registered against the husband and his near and dear innocent relatives found making false allegation. It is common that in these kinds of complaints the complainants happens to involve the accused relatives. And after investigation it is seen that the in this type of complaints the accused remains/found as innocent.
Smt Akshata BC has filed allegedly a false complaint and based on a false compliant an FIR No 223/2015 dated 07-10-2015 is registered at Mandya West Police Station. As per compromise agreement dated 29-09-2014 arrived at Mandyapolice station she is not suppose to come toShivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 yearshouse and then file a false compliant .Shivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 years and their son S Murlidhar is adult and of 35 years of age and their house is not his house and he has to make his own arrangement of living his life with his wife .
Smt Akshata BC Complaint is false and baseless as compromise agreement dated 29-09-2014 arrived at Mandya police station(West)she was staying with her family at MysoreandShivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 years reside separately andsubjectingSmt Akshata BC to cruelty does not arise as both families reside separately and slapping of section 498A of IPC on themdoes not arise .Please note that both family addresses are different where she stays at Mysore and where Shivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 years stay at Mandya are mentioned incompromise agreement dated 29-09-2014 itself. Smt Akshata BC coming to their house with her accomplices and father and mother is house tress pass and she has committed crime under section 448 of IPC and 506 and 120B of IPC and policeneed to file counter FIR on them as they all have violated compromise agreement dated 29-09-2014 arrived at Mandyapolice station and committed crime under section 448 of IPC and 506 and 120B of IPC.
Mandya Police need to protect Shivalinagaiahs/o Sri ChickkalingaiahAged about 78 yearsand Smt Jayamma w/o ShivalinagaiahAged about 68 years under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Act No. 56 of 2007) Cognizance of offences: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (2 of 1974) every offence under this Act shall be cognizable and bailable.It was agreed and a compromise agreement was reached under the guidance of police that Smt Akshata BC and her husband S Murlidhar our fourth son will stay separately and since then murlidhar parents have nothing to do with their affairs since 29-09-2014 and it was agreed that Smt Akshata BC will stay at her parents' house until he makes separate home for her. Since then she is not staying with senior citizens.