Site news

FALSE FIR AND FALSE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY PSI WHITE FIELD POLICE STATION IN FIR 50/2012

 
 
Picture of System Administrator
FALSE FIR AND FALSE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY PSI WHITE FIELD POLICE STATION IN FIR 50/2012
by System Administrator - Sunday, 11 January 2015, 11:39 PM
 

By : M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangaluru : Credibility of Bangalore police is in question. Request is made to Sri M.N.Reddy IPS The Commissioner of Police Bangalauru to take necessary legal action as per IPC and criminal procedure code against PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station in respect of False complaint false FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 and filing false charge sheet and framing and fabricating false case on accused Sri D.V.Ramu and Smt Lalitha . False complaint False FIR and false charge sheet in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 by PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station. Evidently the complainant in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 is again accused in FIR Number 121/2012 dated 22-04-2012 for suppressing her earlier marriages and tress pass in in-laws house and charge sheeted by same PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station. This contradiction proves that PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station has committed blunder and willfully filed False FIR and false charge sheet in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 against innocents parents and senior citizens with ulterior motives to harass innocents parents and senior citizens and black mail them as complainant in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 huge money for settlement in Family court and even filed false domestic violence case . The place of alleged crime as per complainant is "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 whereas in FIR and charge sheet place of alleged crime was changed deliberately to "No 38 1 Cross 1ST MAIN Prashanta Layout White Field Bangalore: 560066 .Whereas the complainant never stayed at this place with her in laws Sri D.V.Ramu and Smt Lalitha as it was love marriage and at the time of complaint her husband was not staying at with her as he had filed divorce petition a month before. Based on false PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station have filed false change sheet.The complaint of Smt Pankaja does not warrant slapping of IPC section 498A by police as No demand for dowry was made , section 498-A could not be attracted in such circumstances .General allegations are not sufficient to procure 498-A in Surajmal Barithia V. State of west Bengal 11 (2003) DMC 546 (Cal) (DB). Taunting is not Cruelty in Savitri Devi Vs Ramesh Chand , 2003, Cri LJ 2759 (Del) : 2003 (3) Crime 100. While interpreting the provisions of Section 304-B, 498-A, 306 and 324, IPC in the decision reported as State of H.P.v Nikku Ram & Ors 1995 (6) SCC 219 the Supreme Court observed that harassment to constitute cruelty under explanation (b) to Section 498-A must have nexus with the demand of dowry and if this is missing the case will fall beyond the scope of Section 498-A, IPC. Petty quarrels cannot be termed as `cruelty' to attract the provisions of Section 498-A IPC. Similar view was taken by the Punjab & Haryana High Court in the decision reported as Richhpal Kaur v. State of Haryana and Anr. 1991 (2) Recent Criminal Reports 53 wherein it was observed that offence under Section 498-A IPC would not be made out if beating given to bride by husband and his relations was due to domestic disputes and not on account of demand of dowry. It is thus clear from the reading of Section 498-A IPC and afore-noted judicial pronouncements that pre-condition for attracting the provisions of Explanation (b) to Section 498-A IPC is the demand and if the demand is missing and the cruelty is for the sake of giving torture to the women without any nexus with the demand then such a cruelty will not be covered under explanation (b) to Section 498-A, IPC. It may be a cruelty within the scope of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as held by the Supreme Court in the decision reported as Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddy AIR 1998 SC 121. In said case, it was observed that cruelty under Section 498-A IPC is distinct from the cruelty under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. If a woman's complaint accusing her husband and in-laws of cruelty under the dreaded Section 498A of Indian Penal Code turns out to be false, then the man is entitled to divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled.

When the accused and complainant were not staying together and in laws were never residents at No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 with complainant at the complainant address in her complaint then question of torturing the complainantunder section 498A does not arise as both were staying separately at two different addresses . Charge sheet filed is false in case FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 by white fields police and they need to file B-Report or withdraw the case .Neighbors, who are potential eye-witnesses of the real facts, statements are not recorded which provide information that alleged allegations are false and not possible to occur. Documentary evidences from both residences of accused and complainants in Bangalore were not collected which provide information that allegations are false.White field Police Station have filed FIR Number 121/2012 dated 22-04-2012 and charge sheet on Smt Pankaja :It is pertinent to note that same white filed police have filedcharge sheet inFIR Number 121/2012 dated 22-04-2012 the resident address ofSmt Pankaja is shown as"No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”. This FIR and charge sheet itself is proof of PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station in respect of false FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 have filed false FIR and false chage sheet in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012.The same White field Police Stationhave filed one more FIR on Smt Pankaja In FIR 22/2014 DATED 23-01-2014 Smt Pankajashowing her resident address as"No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”. And in Smt Pankaja has mentioned her resident address in her bail also as "No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618”.

Conclusions : As per above records : Smt Pankajaresiding at address"No 136 4 th cross Prshantha Layout White Field Bangalore -560066 her Phone Number 9900789618” and she never stayedather Father in law house at"No 38 1 Cross 1ST MAIN Prashanta Layout White Field Bangalore: 560066 wherefore the charge sheet filed inFIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 false incorrect and misleading and leading to miscarriage of justice to accused inFIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 and police need to revise charge sheet and file B Report in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 or withdraw the case . I request the authority issue directions to take legal action against PSI Sadananda of White field Police Station in respect of filing false FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 and filing false charge sheet and framing and fabricating false case on accused Sri D.V.Ramu and Smt Lalitha and issue directions to withdraw the case in FIR Number 50/2012 dated 19-02-2012 in the interest of justice and equity