By: M.S.Yatnatti: Editor and Video Journalist Bangaluru: I have asked police department to provide me information and reasons under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act how Madivala police have booked Two FIRs-FIR Number 301/2012 and FIR Number 214/2012 on same crime on two different persons on two different dates by two different persons where innocent is arrested and charge sheeted and culprit is scot free and treated royally by Madivala police.FIR Number 301/2012 the complaint is filed by department and it is a clear case of tax evasion and cheating by proprietor of classic steel Bommanhalli and clear bills were made on known customers of classic steels and they all have tin numbers and recognise their transactions as genuine and payments were made by cheques by invoicees and vendors and police can take the statement given before department by N.R.Enterprises as evidence where he clearly states that transaction were genuine wherefore question of misusing the password and user ID does not arise . It is clear case of fraud to cheat the government by classic steel to avoid legitimate payments due to commercial tax department and he has tried to falsely implicate someone else by filing FIR in Madiwala police station and illegally influencing the police at Madivala police station to file false charge sheet .Please provide me information and reasons under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act how Madivala police did not booked under Information technology Act the FIRs when offence complained is about password theft and cyber crime police station was more capable of investigation.Please provide me information and reasons under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act how Madivala police believe The Classic steels in his false complaint to department states on 23-01-2012 that his last invoke was Number 47 but the computer statements by department states that transaction were continuously raised .The invoice raiser is known and invoice and consignee is known and then why taxes are not collected from the culprits and why unconnected persons is charge sheeted in FIR Number 214/2012 .Innocent is punished for no fault of him and arrested and humiliated. Please provide me information and reasons under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act how much time Madiwala police take to charge sheet in FIR Number 301/2012 and file B report inFIR Number 214/2012 who is no connected to transactions happened between classic steels and its vendors on which invoices have been raised and money received through cheques by classic steels wherefore question of misusing the password and user ID does not arise in the interest of justice and equity.The Bangalore Police are THE PUBLIC AUTHORITY under obligation to provide information "PUBLICLY” under section 4(I) (a) (b) (c) (d) RTI Act.
Citizens can force every PA to create information every day strictly as per the system and procedure as per listed Acts and rules regulations listed under 4(1) (a) (b) (c) every day and that can be cross cheeked by applicant by asking reasons under 4(1) (d) by the affected person and copy of the same can be given to any applicant under 2( f)of RTI Act .Promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority. Policy on Prevention, Detection, and Remediation of Fraud and Corruption by government is must and a major element of good governance is the control of corruption. For that reason, controlling corruption has been a key indicator. Good governance is a keystone of government. UPA government has given you RTI Act: Use It optimally :All opposition parties should use RTI optimally .Let they create booth wise RTI activists among their members or cadets and give them training and set of questions and gather that booth level information to perform better as opposition parties .Prime Minister should listen to opposition parties as they are voice of 66% voters. All responsible citizens should send RTI Question to each MP and each Minister and Prime Minister and get to know every day what they are doing and what they are performing and keep check on their performances and give them clear indication that India is awakened and want responsible Government which listens citizens.. All 70 MLAs and 543 MPs are public servants : After election are over all MLAs are public servants and they are MLA for all the constituency .All MLAs should chalk out their plans for development of their constituencies irrespective of who voted for them or who is not voted for them . THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 is an Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority.RTI Act provides transparency under Section 3 and4(1) (a) (b) (c) and 2(f) of RTI Act 2005 and accountability under 4(1) (d) RTI Act 2005 as the PA will create information; or to interpret information; or to solve the problems raised by the applicants under the system and procedure as per listed Acts and rules regulations listed under 4(1) (a) (b) (c) every day and that can be cross cheeked by applicant by asking reasons under 4(1) (d) by the affected person and copy of the same can be given to any applicant under 2( f)of RTI Act .
Laws exist, simply put, to ensure the greater good for the greater number of people. This in turn ensures a fairly well organized and safe society. If people were not bound by laws, our society would be full of citizens doing what they most felt like doing (for their own needs and desires.) At the risk of sounding cliche, this would lead to anarchy. I agree that people will always act in their own best interest, and this is not likely to be in the best interest of the many. There are some people who will act according to their own moral code, but even morality varies. For the sake of the greater good and in order to reign in those who act without moral, we have laws.Laws exist because people are selfish and greedy and would steal from and kill each other if they could. That, at least, is how most thinkers see the question.This is the answer given by political philosophers like Locke and Hobbes. They wondered why people live in societies with laws and such. They decided it was because societies without laws were places where people's lives were, in Hobbes' words, "nasty, brutish and short."According to Locke, laws come about because people want their lives, liberties, and property to be protected. Laws are made to prevent other people from violating those basic human rights.Laws created under the Harm Principle are written to protect people from being harmed by others. Laws against violent crime and property crime fall into this category. Without basic Harm Principle laws, a society ultimately degenerates into despotism--the rule of the strong and violent over the weak and nonviolent. Harm Principle laws are essential, and every government on Earth has them. In addition to laws intended to discourage people from harming each other, some laws are written to prohibit self-harm. Parental Principle laws include compulsory attendance laws for children, laws against neglect of children and vulnerable adults, and laws banning the possession of certain drugs. Some Parental Principle laws are essential to protect children and vulnerable adults, but even in those cases they can be oppressive if they are not narrowly written and sensibly enforced. Some laws are based not strictly on harm or self-harm concerns, but also on promoting the personal morality of the law's authors. These laws are usually, but not always, grounded in religious belief. The most dangerous laws are those intended to protect the government from harm, or to increase its power for its own sake. Some Statist Principle laws are necessary--laws against treason and espionage, for example, are essential to the stability of government. But Statist Principle laws can also be dangerous--laws restricting criticism of the government, such as flag burning laws that prohibit the desecration of symbols that remind people of the government, can easily lead to a politically oppressive society full of imprisoned dissidents and frightened citizens who are afraid to speak out.